<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spain Stays on Top of the FIFA Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html</link>
	<description>World Cup South Africa 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:45:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568701</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568701</guid>
		<description>u guys still suc my ballz in all wc competions so shut up puta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u guys still suc my ballz in all wc competions so shut up puta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9 Champions Leagues</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568665</link>
		<dc:creator>9 Champions Leagues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568665</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the new era: la furia roja. Que viva españa coño.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the new era: la furia roja. Que viva españa coño.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568656</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568656</guid>
		<description>Numbers, math, proof, bah. I prefer my simpleton&#039;s understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numbers, math, proof, bah. I prefer my simpleton&#8217;s understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568655</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568655</guid>
		<description>yes very nice facts and all but the rankings shud be up to date not including stats from 4 yrs ago.we wnt to no who is bttr now...who shud win if they play tmrw..(cameroon v egypt) based on the last half yr egypt wud be the favored team...and if its tru thts its an accumulation of the pst 4 ys then the rankings r b.s. we dont wnt to no who was bttr 4 yrs ago...besides based on ur facts..if egypt were to win the world cup than they stil wudnt be ranked #1..if this is tru than the fifa rankings r fucin bs...all in all i agree with john!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes very nice facts and all but the rankings shud be up to date not including stats from 4 yrs ago.we wnt to no who is bttr now&#8230;who shud win if they play tmrw..(cameroon v egypt) based on the last half yr egypt wud be the favored team&#8230;and if its tru thts its an accumulation of the pst 4 ys then the rankings r b.s. we dont wnt to no who was bttr 4 yrs ago&#8230;besides based on ur facts..if egypt were to win the world cup than they stil wudnt be ranked #1..if this is tru than the fifa rankings r fucin bs&#8230;all in all i agree with john!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazback</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568648</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568648</guid>
		<description>John &amp; Omar : Egypt beat Cameroon at the ACN, but Egypt has a lot of defeats and draws over the past four years against teams they should beat (i.e. no losing to Argentina, Spain or Brazil)... 4-0 defeat against Sudan (20/08/2008), 1-0 defeat against Malawi (14/06/2008), 4-1 defeat against Japan (17/10/2007), 2-0 defeat against Uruguay (16/08/2006), 2-1 defeat against South Africa (14/01/2006), 2-1 defeat against Tunisia (16/11/2005), 2-1 against Lybia (08/10/2004)... As well as against Portugal, Ivory Coast, Spain and Argentina. And draws all over the place (Bulgaria [29/11/2004], UAE [31/07/2005], Cameroon [08/10/2005], Morocco [24/01/2006], Ivory Coast [10/02/2006], Botswana [07/10/2006], Mauritania [03/06/2007], Kuwait [12/06/2007], Ivory Coast [22/08/2007], Burundi [09/09/2007], Libya [21/11/2007], Angola [13/01/2008], Zambia [30/01/2008]). Egypt are the reigning champions of Africa, but they didn&#039;t qualify for the World Cup 2006 (they finished 3rd of their group, behind Ivory Coast and Cameroon).

Thing is, Although Egypt beat Cameroon twice in the last ACN, over the past four years, Cameroon have gained more points. Or perhaps Egypt have simply &quot;lost more&quot; points by drawing/losing more often against minnows. After all, France beat Spain convincingly in 2006, but their inability to do it in 2004 and 2008 means that Spain is ahead of France.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &amp; Omar : Egypt beat Cameroon at the ACN, but Egypt has a lot of defeats and draws over the past four years against teams they should beat (i.e. no losing to Argentina, Spain or Brazil)&#8230; 4-0 defeat against Sudan (20/08/2008), 1-0 defeat against Malawi (14/06/2008), 4-1 defeat against Japan (17/10/2007), 2-0 defeat against Uruguay (16/08/2006), 2-1 defeat against South Africa (14/01/2006), 2-1 defeat against Tunisia (16/11/2005), 2-1 against Lybia (08/10/2004)&#8230; As well as against Portugal, Ivory Coast, Spain and Argentina. And draws all over the place (Bulgaria [29/11/2004], UAE [31/07/2005], Cameroon [08/10/2005], Morocco [24/01/2006], Ivory Coast [10/02/2006], Botswana [07/10/2006], Mauritania [03/06/2007], Kuwait [12/06/2007], Ivory Coast [22/08/2007], Burundi [09/09/2007], Libya [21/11/2007], Angola [13/01/2008], Zambia [30/01/2008]). Egypt are the reigning champions of Africa, but they didn&#8217;t qualify for the World Cup 2006 (they finished 3rd of their group, behind Ivory Coast and Cameroon).</p>
<p>Thing is, Although Egypt beat Cameroon twice in the last ACN, over the past four years, Cameroon have gained more points. Or perhaps Egypt have simply &#8220;lost more&#8221; points by drawing/losing more often against minnows. After all, France beat Spain convincingly in 2006, but their inability to do it in 2004 and 2008 means that Spain is ahead of France.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568646</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568646</guid>
		<description>john, you&#039;re incorrect.  It&#039;s all numerical -- explained here http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/so-where-do-those-fifa-rankings-come-from-anyway.html -- it&#039;s a running total of points accumulated over the last four years.

Whether or not it&#039;s accurate is open to debate, but it&#039;s not arbitrary or a &quot;popularity contest.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john, you&#8217;re incorrect.  It&#8217;s all numerical &#8212; explained here <a href="http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/so-where-do-those-fifa-rankings-come-from-anyway.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/so-where-do-those-fifa-rankings-come-from-anyway.html</a> &#8212; it&#8217;s a running total of points accumulated over the last four years.</p>
<p>Whether or not it&#8217;s accurate is open to debate, but it&#8217;s not arbitrary or a &#8220;popularity contest.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568645</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568645</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I&#039;m sure if Egypt had more high profile players competing in European leagues, they&#039;d get fairer shakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I&#8217;m sure if Egypt had more high profile players competing in European leagues, they&#8217;d get fairer shakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568644</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568644</guid>
		<description>omar - I find it&#039;s best to regaurd the FIFA rankings as more of a popularity contest. So don&#039;t worry about it: they&#039;re completely meaningless. Regaurdless of what Cameroon are ranked, they&#039;re still the same squad, and one Egypt will probably continue to beat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omar &#8211; I find it&#8217;s best to regaurd the FIFA rankings as more of a popularity contest. So don&#8217;t worry about it: they&#8217;re completely meaningless. Regaurdless of what Cameroon are ranked, they&#8217;re still the same squad, and one Egypt will probably continue to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568643</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568643</guid>
		<description>fuc we r 10 rankings behind cameroon some one plz explain the bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!wtf is goin on?????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuc we r 10 rankings behind cameroon some one plz explain the bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!wtf is goin on?????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-568642</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/spain-stays-on-top-of-the-fifa-rankings.html#comment-568642</guid>
		<description>can anyone...anyone explain to me WHY egypt is still ranked 22..8 or so fucing spots under cameroon who we raped 4-2 and beat in the final 1-0..both games in african cup of nations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can anyone&#8230;anyone explain to me WHY egypt is still ranked 22..8 or so fucing spots under cameroon who we raped 4-2 and beat in the final 1-0..both games in african cup of nations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

