<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FIFA World Rankings February 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/fifa-world-rankings-february-2008.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/fifa-world-rankings-february-2008.html</link>
	<description>World Cup South Africa 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:45:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bman</title>
		<link>http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/fifa-world-rankings-february-2008.html/comment-page-1#comment-536589</link>
		<dc:creator>Bman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldcupblog.org/world-football/fifa-world-rankings-february-2008.html#comment-536589</guid>
		<description>The rankings are complete rubish. We observed without a doubt that the best African team is Egypt. They destroyed Coite Dvoire, Beat Cameroon 2 times and destroyed anyone else in their path. Yet, Cameroon and Ghana are in the top 20 and Coite Dvoire is ahead of them too. 

I though if you are ahead of someone in a rankings table you should be better then them. Oh well i guess im wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rankings are complete rubish. We observed without a doubt that the best African team is Egypt. They destroyed Coite Dvoire, Beat Cameroon 2 times and destroyed anyone else in their path. Yet, Cameroon and Ghana are in the top 20 and Coite Dvoire is ahead of them too. </p>
<p>I though if you are ahead of someone in a rankings table you should be better then them. Oh well i guess im wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

