dot   Home     World     World Cup Blog  

French Revolution: The Battle for the Future of French Football

In June, France exited Euro 2008 in the group stages with two losses and one draw. The scoreline totals? A disastrous one goal scored for France, six scored against.

In the aftermath, coach Raymond Domenech was widely expected to get the sack. It didn’t happen. In July, the Fédération Française de Football (FFF) voted 18-0 with one abstention to retain him as coach of the France National Team.

The Euro fiasco and the vote to retain Domenech have created a heated battle in France over the future of the team, and especially over who will lead it. It’s been portrayed as a pro- vs. anti-Domenech fight, but that’s too simplistic. Underneath it all, this is more about the future of the game in France.

On one side of the battle, we have the traditionalists of the FFF, led by President Jean-Pierre Escalettes. If I understand the view of the traditionalists correctly, one works one’s way up to the job of National Team coach by being an FFF team player. Raymond Domenech is the perfect example of the company man: He paid his dues to the organization by serving as coach of the U-21s for eleven years. The National Team was the reward. The widespread view was that Domenech was retained after Euros because the FFF didn’t have a company man ready to take his place.

On the other side of the fence, we have the reformers. The most outspoken members of this faction are France’s World Cup-winning players from 1998. Among them: Bixente Lizarazu, Cristophe Dugarry, and Emmanuel Petit. And, most recently, Robert Pirès and Zinedine Zidane. I get the impression that these reformers feel the FFF is getting a bit…inbred. After Euros, they lobbied in the press for the NT job go to one of their own, probably Didier Deschamps, or possibly Laurent Blanc.

But neither Blanc nor Deschamps are FFF guys, and Escalettes and the gang were none too happy with what they saw as outside interference. And Escalettes inadvertently fanned the flames recently by publicly discussing how the FFF resisted pressure from the reformers of 1998 — a group he called a “clan.”

That description infuriated a lot of folks, especially the members of that so-called clan. Several, including Zidane, have spoken out, saying that they didn’t act as part of a concerted effort, but instead spoke up as individuals who care deeply about the future of the team. Dugarry went so far as to say that the true clan was the FFF.

The public outcry has been huge. The World Cup winners from 1998 are icons in France. With Escalettes’ criticism, the tide of public opinion seems to have been turning away from the pro-Domenech forces in the FFF.

The FFF has been working to try to shore up support, doing things like naming 1998 player Alain Boghossian as an assistant coach for the NT, and asking France’s beloved and most-capped player, Lilian Thuram, to take a place on the FFF. Will it be enough?

Meanwhile, on the pitch, Domenech didn’t help his own case in France’s first World Cup qualifier against Austria. France’s FIFA ranking was about 100 places higher than Austria’s, but France got thumped, 3-1. Domenech redeemed himself a bit against Serbia with a 2-1 win, but it wasn’t anywhere close to enough to quiet the critics.

And so everything rests on France’s game against Romania on October 11. A decisive win would buy Domenech some more time. With a loss, or possibly even with a draw, though, this powder keg is gonna blow. Domenech will almost certainly be replaced.

The big question is: By whom?

Subscribe

 

rss icon World Cup Soccer – South Africa 2010 RSS Feed

Print

Share

Comments
By gaston | October 2nd, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Top

wenger

Posted from United States United States

By matt | October 2nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Top

if it was wenger i’d start buying french national team games on ppv.

Posted from United States United States

By Laurie | October 2nd, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Top

I just can’t see Wenger giving up Arsenal for the trials and tribs of working with the FFF.

Posted from United States United States

By alessio | October 2nd, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Top

Why not Deschamps? I’ve always liked the guy, I think he’d be great for France.

Posted from United States United States

By Laurie | October 2nd, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Top

Deschamps doesn’t have the FFF connections, so he was opposed by a lot of the folks who were voting.

Posted from United States United States

By Mo | October 2nd, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Top

Anyone but Domenech… And Wenger needs to stay at Arsenal

Posted from United States United States

By Lissette Blue | October 2nd, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Top

Well if it is Wenger then Platini will start a feud again and his dad will get involved.

By gaston | October 2nd, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Top

paul la guan, i don’t think he has coached france before

Posted from United States United States

By gaston | October 2nd, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Top

forgot eric cantona, his doing well with with beach soccer team, maybe he can transfer over to national team

Posted from United States United States

By lefutur | October 3rd, 2008 at 9:59 am
Top

If Deschamps doesn’t have FFF connections then neither does Wenger and it would be absolutely crazy not to hire Wenger for the position if he indicated he would take it. My feelings are that the FFF is too much of a old boys club. The fact that they voted unanimously to keep Domenech after the euro says a lot.

Posted from United States United States

By Laurie | October 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 am
Top

One other thing I think it’s important to remember is that a lot of this is fundamentally about the history and identity of the FFF. Keep in mind that the FFF President for the first 30 years of its existence (minus two years during WW II) was Jules Rimet. Yes, that Jules Rimet, the father of the World Cup. The FFF has historically been a big player in the international game, helping to promote and standardize the game across the world. To the FFF supporters, that really means something: The FFF is a venerable organization.

For FFF detractors, though, it means they take themselves too seriously and don’t listen to outside voices, which has caused a team with amazing amounts of individual talent to stagnate.

I’ll be very curious to see how this turns out.

Posted from United States United States

By sandrahn | October 3rd, 2008 at 11:07 am
Top

Nice blog, Laurie.

The FFF’s relationship with Wenger is just as prickly as it is with Deschamps and the ‘98 guys. Wenger simply doesn’t like int’l football, he finds it boring. Someday he may change his mind but he’s consistently and openly expressed his indifference to int’l football. He attends them just to scout players. But even if he said he’d be interested in doing it, the FFF wouldn’t hire him. They just don’t like him.

The FFF seem just too entrenched in their bureaucratic rigidity, scares me to think they’d rather see France not qualify for the wc rather than give in and hire Deschamps or anyone who’s outside their little clique.

“that Jules Rimet, the father of the World Cup” — a fact that certain France-bashing people on this site don’t acknowledge: THE FRENCH INVENTED THE WORLD CUP AND THEY INVENTED THE EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIPS.

Posted from United States United States

By Nassi | October 8th, 2008 at 2:10 am
Top

Wenger is the best choice.

Posted from China China

Comments are closed

 
 
 

CATEGORIES & ARCHIVES

 
 
Closer