dot   Home     World     World Cup Blog  

Getting shirty – Was Italy’s penalty deserved?

   

This is part of our series on World Cup controversies

penpemn

Italy’s World Cup is on the rocks after their unconvincing 1-1 draw with New Zealand. But should Vincenzo Iaquinta even had the chance to grab the Azzurri’s goal following disputes over referee Carlos Batres award of the spotkick?

Five months ago to the day, All White’s defender Tommy Smith had just suffered defeat by Brentford in the third tier of English football, on loan to the London club after being deemed temporarily surplus to requirements at Championship team Ipswich Town.

But despite his unfathomable journey from football league mediocrity to a starter against world champions Italy at the World Cup, Smith will have a bad taste in his mouth this evening despite his side’s heroic battle with Marcello Lippi’s side.

With his side a goal up through Shane Smeltz, which we’ll discuss later, Italy floated in a slightly wayward cross. Smith tussled with midfield dynamo Daniele De Rossi. He tugged on his jersey and the Roma player dropped to the ground. Guatemalan official Batres pointed to the spot almost immediately to constination from New Zealand and booked Smith.

Iaquinta cooly dispatched the kick past a wrongly-diving Mark Paston to equalise and ultimately leave the game level at full-time.

So was the decision correct? The picture below shows the pull on the jersey from Smith and while it isn’t tremendously restricting De Rossi’s movement, there’s no doubt that Smith has a firm hold. The video slip shows highlights from the full game but half-way through includes the penalty incident and close-up replays.

shirtpull

What Smith did is of course technically against the rules (Law 12: A penalty kick will be awarded to the opposing team if a player holds an opponent, for pedants among you) but this is something we have seen throughout the tournament.

During the infamous Maurice Edu incident, a conglemarate of USA players were being held and in last night’s contest between Denmark and Cameroon, Sebastien Bassong was clearly being held by Nicolas Bendtner as Dennis Rommedahl broke into the area to score.

Furthermore, De Rossi’s overreaction, while unsurprising, must surely have influenced Batres decision and I would be shocked if you replayed the ninety minutes and didn’t find another example of a shirt-tug in the box for either side that Batres either didn’t see or ignored.

Consistency is a vital foundation that officials at this years’ finals must try and rally round. We simply can’t have jersey pulls going unnoticed for two weeks and then suddenly a penalty and booking offence. While I concur that Batres can point to the rulebook, it was a harsh call. Although I don’t go quite as far as some Kiwi tabloids

Batres’s position on the pitch is unclear but he is at least 20 or 30 yards from the incident and is on the wrong side to see the shirt pull. This adds further fuel to the idea that he may have based his call more on De Rossi’s flailing fall than the actual hold itself.

Italian fans will no doubt argue that their side shouldn’t have been in a losing position at that time after New Zealand’s opener had a questionable fragrance of offside to it.

First let’s deal with the ball to Smeltz following Simon Elliott’s looping freekick. To my mind, it clearly comes off Winston Reid and I don’t see how there can be little contention with that. When it comes off Reid, as the photo below shows, Smeltz is active and in and offside position.

smeltz

We also need to address the deflection of Italian defender Fabio Cannavaro. Under the offside law (Law 11) if a player sends the ball towards the goal (Reid) but it is deflected by an opponent (Cannavaro) to his opponent (Smeltz) who was in an offside position at the time the initial ball was played then the goal will not be allowed. The deflection off Cannavaro does not affect the basic principles of offside.

You can read more about the Smeltz incident on World Cup Blog here where it is explored in more detail.

Overall, I think a draw was fair result as neither goal was particularly deserved in the spirit of the rules and both teams failed to put any of their further chances away. But I’d be very interested to hear others comments on this as a lot of this is down to interpretation. Was Batres too harsh on Smith or perfectly justified?

Andy is writer of the referee’s blog at World Cup Blog and has written about the subject extensively for range of websites.

Read more about World Cup controversies


  • Bense235

    Great play acting. Was a “could give”, not a “must give”. I personally wouldn't have given it, but that's football. Overall, since the NZ goal shouldn't have counted, it was concessional.

    1:1 was the right result. And you barely EVER see ref's mistakes equaling out each other like that.

  • http://transpolyasexual.wordpress.com/ Cerberus137

    No, Italy are cheating diving bastards.

    And it really shouldn't be that way. The Italian side is filled with some of the best players in the world, simply oozing with quality players with a great flair with the ball and playing honestly they could easily have nearly all the same success they have had playing dirty.

    But no, they've turned cheating the ref into an art and a sad mark on the game, just like Christiano Ronaldo's actions against the Ivory Coast and as such, I hope they get knocked out in the first round. There is no excuse for the type of display the Italians showed this match.

  • Marcamps

    nope.

    yes, there is some shirt pulling & contact, but not enough to bring a man down – and especially not enough force for De Rossi to fall like he did.

    using this ref's logic/criteria, there would be 10 penalties a game.

  • http://japan.worldcupblog.org/ Aidan

    If the Italians think that amount of shirt pulling is a penalty, then they couldn't complain if 10 were given against them every match.

  • http://www.facebook.com/henrydumbleton Henry Dumbleton

    Agreed, In fairness a draw is probably the correct result. But I'm glad to be a New Zealand supporter – because I could not be proud of Italy and their obvious and repeated efforts to cheat.

    Bring on the third ref I say, and lets give red cards to all those that spoil the game by faking.

  • LaurieInSeattle

    I dunno, I kind of liked the equation (Fabiano double handball goal = Kaka red card.) That feels fair to me.

  • http://twitter.com/ashcustomworks Adrian Hamilton

    A missed offside call that takes multiple slo-mo replays from multiple camera angles is forgivable. Repeated blatant cheating from a top-5 team is not. Italy should be thoroughly ashamed of their “men”.

  • http://www.mcalcio.com Marco P.

    “cheating diving bastards”…. thank you for your insight into the question posed by the article. feel free to keep your entirely stereotypical view of a football nation.

  • http://france.worldcupblog.org/ OffsideSarah

    If we are going to apply the letter of the law (as opposed to the spirit of the law) diving is also against the rule – so, De Rossi should have been penalized as well…

  • http://twitter.com/PaulArens Paul Arens

    Wild inconsistency in this tournament. Look at this shirt hold compared to the one that Lucio had today or when the England player practically removed the other players pants in (if I recall correctly) the Algeria game. The fix is in, players for the top seeded teams who are well known “champion's league” calibre players can't be called for PKs unless they commit a red card worthy offense.

    This also extends to tackles. For example, how many card-able offenses will Nigel de Jong get away with during this tournament.

  • Bendleton

    Italy cheats! They fake fouls in the box. Actors! But bad actors. Italy, as a country, should be ashamed of themselves. They can't win with skill, so the pretend to be fouled in the box. It is pathetic and shameful. Italy should be banned from the World Cup. Feckless poltroons!

  • http://transpolyasexual.wordpress.com/ Cerberus137

    True I should have phrased it more as this particular team and the teams which have worn the Azurri's colors for the last so many years. Italy (the national team) has had teams that haven't felt they needed to cheat to win in the past and certainly a number of club teams playing in Italy haven't needed to cheat to win.

    But as of late on the international stage, they've been really easy to despise for refusing to play the game instead preferring a game consisting of trying to con the ref.

    There's no place for it and to me it disgraces their colors and the massive talent the team possess naturally. A team that good simply shouldn't be playing like the villain team in every sports movie ever made.

  • http://twitter.com/agiamba Aaron Giambattista

    Because Brazil and English players never cheat either, right?

  • http://twitter.com/agiamba Aaron Giambattista

    The Italian side is filled with some of the best players in the world, simply oozing with quality players with a great flair with the ball and playing honestly they could easily have nearly all the same success they have had playing dirty.

    As if your first line wasn't moronic enough, this proves you absolutely don't know one f***ing bit about the Italy squad.

  • barrilete26

    All athletes cheat and no one can deny that. What bothers me the most is how a team with so many talented players (no one can deny that) has to resort to those shameful tactics. It reminds me of the incident between Italy and Australia in the 2006 world cup.

    I can see how a modest team like a first ever participant could see diving as an option, which isn't right, because they simply can't compete with their opponent. But, Italy, really? The current world champions should be ashamed of their performance.

    New Zealand deserved the win. They gave it all they had and showed more passion. Something the Italian team has been lacking since a few years ago.

  • MainlyMe

    Italian prima donna theatrics on the field of football are making a mockery of the game, and of the officials that get mesmerised by their acting. Today the game between Il Azzurri and the All Whites was no exception. DAN SILKSTONE in the SYDNEY MORNING HERALD said it best in his column when he said:
    “But Italian football can defy the laws of physics; only here does a small pull backwards on the shirt send a grown man tumbling forwards. New Zealand fell victim to a familiar trick as Italy milked a half-there penalty to even the score.”

    The time has come that football must move to stamp out this habit that is undermining the credibility of the game and bringing it into disrepute, and if it can’t be attended to on the field by the officials then it should be attended to by a video official placing offending players “on report” for later judgment. When judgement falls, penalties should be harsh and two-pronged; in the wallet and through compulsory stand-downs. The Australian Rugby League competition provides a proven model that would serve well as a model. Let’s see how long the Hollywood dives and other histrionics would continue if each was likely to be met with a $50,000 fine, and a 2-match stand-down. I predict that overnight this despicable habit would be stamped out!

  • http://www.mcalcio.com Marco P.

    Wow… what a brilliant tactical analysis. The team “with more passion” deserves the win.

    I guess getting outplayed (57% possession), outshot (23 vs. 3), and basically failing to produce anything substantial on the offensive end of the pitch (except for an offside goal on set-pieces) is just background noise. No, clearly the better team today were the kiwis.

    And you sir, are the next José Mourinho.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UTLSJWJSGX4U6POVIKZ2SV2EJA da_undacoverbrother

    “New Zealand deserved the win. They gave it all they had and showed more passion”. …Sorry this is not kindergarten where participation and passion is rewarded with the most smiley faces

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UTLSJWJSGX4U6POVIKZ2SV2EJA da_undacoverbrother

    The Italians have made a mockery of FIFA's crackdown on diving. Agreed that NZ do not deserve their goal, the fair result was 0-0, and for Slovakia and Paraguay to progress

  • VanWolfie

    I agree it was a technically correct but very harsh decision. A bit like Rodriguez' card on Cahill a few days ago.

  • footballkid

    Bendleton, relax…you mean to tell me that in WC2006 Italy had no skill on the team, and the only way they win is through fouls commited like the on yesterday? Look at other teams first before you judge Italy for being cheats.

  • Johnstoa

    Remember Aus v Italy in 2006? Italy have bad form in this area. Forget the score – I'd like to think the average Italian would be embarrassed by this. They should be.

    For me, as long as football continues to avoid penalising cheats theatrics will always prosper over hard fought competition. Why should football be treated any different to any other sport and allow this? My kids now think that diving on the field is the right thing to do…

  • TheBrossy

    there was an obvious tactic by the Italians to dive strategically. I have to hand it to them, they are very good at it but that's not really something to be proud of. They realised there was no chance of winning headers over Fallon or Killen so they fell to the ground clutching their faces every time they lost a header (most occasions). What it requires is no shame whatsoever. If other nations were doing this kind of thing, the public would likely not bother with the team as to win like that is not really worth celbrating unless you have some pride.

  • TheBrossy

    I think that's the problem – they aren't embarassed by it nor the guy rolloing around on the ground clutching his face while banging the ground with his other hand. It is so ridiculous to most but perfectly normal in the eyes of Azzuri

  • Johnstoa

    The problem isn't unique to the Italians, and that's a huge problem for football as a game. Any sport, darts/curling/snooker/crab racing, that doesn't heavily penalise anyone intentionally cheating is disrespecting the fans. Sepp Blatter either fixes this or he's as bad as the poor little Italian bloke who's rolling around on the manicured grass clutching his face when his shirts been pulled.

    Sepp Blatter came out after the Italians did this against Aus in 2006 and actually apologised – then did bugger all about it. That's real leadership for you righ there.

blog comments powered by Disqus
 

CATEGORIES & ARCHIVES

 

 
Closer

International Football Jerseys
Bet on International Football
Football Tickets
Noticias de Futbol
Tournaments
Euro 2012 Qualifying
Africa Cup of Nations 2012
UEFA Champions League
Europa League

Follow WorldCupBlog on Facebook   Follow WorldCupBlog on Twitter  
World Cup Resources
World Cup History
World Cup Legends
World Cup Memorable Moments
World Cup Photos
World Cup Videos