Getting shirty – Was Italy’s penalty deserved?
This is part of our series on World Cup controversies

Italy’s World Cup is on the rocks after their unconvincing 1-1 draw with New Zealand. But should Vincenzo Iaquinta even had the chance to grab the Azzurri’s goal following disputes over referee Carlos Batres award of the spotkick?
Five months ago to the day, All White’s defender Tommy Smith had just suffered defeat by Brentford in the third tier of English football, on loan to the London club after being deemed temporarily surplus to requirements at Championship team Ipswich Town.
But despite his unfathomable journey from football league mediocrity to a starter against world champions Italy at the World Cup, Smith will have a bad taste in his mouth this evening despite his side’s heroic battle with Marcello Lippi’s side.
With his side a goal up through Shane Smeltz, which we’ll discuss later, Italy floated in a slightly wayward cross. Smith tussled with midfield dynamo Daniele De Rossi. He tugged on his jersey and the Roma player dropped to the ground. Guatemalan official Batres pointed to the spot almost immediately to constination from New Zealand and booked Smith.
Iaquinta cooly dispatched the kick past a wrongly-diving Mark Paston to equalise and ultimately leave the game level at full-time.
So was the decision correct? The picture below shows the pull on the jersey from Smith and while it isn’t tremendously restricting De Rossi’s movement, there’s no doubt that Smith has a firm hold. The video slip shows highlights from the full game but half-way through includes the penalty incident and close-up replays.

What Smith did is of course technically against the rules (Law 12: A penalty kick will be awarded to the opposing team if a player holds an opponent, for pedants among you) but this is something we have seen throughout the tournament.
During the infamous Maurice Edu incident, a conglemarate of USA players were being held and in last night’s contest between Denmark and Cameroon, Sebastien Bassong was clearly being held by Nicolas Bendtner as Dennis Rommedahl broke into the area to score.
Furthermore, De Rossi’s overreaction, while unsurprising, must surely have influenced Batres decision and I would be shocked if you replayed the ninety minutes and didn’t find another example of a shirt-tug in the box for either side that Batres either didn’t see or ignored.
Consistency is a vital foundation that officials at this years’ finals must try and rally round. We simply can’t have jersey pulls going unnoticed for two weeks and then suddenly a penalty and booking offence. While I concur that Batres can point to the rulebook, it was a harsh call. Although I don’t go quite as far as some Kiwi tabloids…
Batres’s position on the pitch is unclear but he is at least 20 or 30 yards from the incident and is on the wrong side to see the shirt pull. This adds further fuel to the idea that he may have based his call more on De Rossi’s flailing fall than the actual hold itself.
Italian fans will no doubt argue that their side shouldn’t have been in a losing position at that time after New Zealand’s opener had a questionable fragrance of offside to it.
First let’s deal with the ball to Smeltz following Simon Elliott’s looping freekick. To my mind, it clearly comes off Winston Reid and I don’t see how there can be little contention with that. When it comes off Reid, as the photo below shows, Smeltz is active and in and offside position.

We also need to address the deflection of Italian defender Fabio Cannavaro. Under the offside law (Law 11) if a player sends the ball towards the goal (Reid) but it is deflected by an opponent (Cannavaro) to his opponent (Smeltz) who was in an offside position at the time the initial ball was played then the goal will not be allowed. The deflection off Cannavaro does not affect the basic principles of offside.
You can read more about the Smeltz incident on World Cup Blog here where it is explored in more detail.
Overall, I think a draw was fair result as neither goal was particularly deserved in the spirit of the rules and both teams failed to put any of their further chances away. But I’d be very interested to hear others comments on this as a lot of this is down to interpretation. Was Batres too harsh on Smith or perfectly justified?
Andy is writer of the referee’s blog at World Cup Blog and has written about the subject extensively for range of websites.
Read more about World Cup controversies
-
Bense235
-
http://transpolyasexual.wordpress.com/ Cerberus137
-
Marcamps
-
http://japan.worldcupblog.org/ Aidan
-
http://www.facebook.com/henrydumbleton Henry Dumbleton
-
LaurieInSeattle
-
http://twitter.com/ashcustomworks Adrian Hamilton
-
http://www.mcalcio.com Marco P.
-
http://france.worldcupblog.org/ OffsideSarah
-
http://twitter.com/PaulArens Paul Arens
-
Bendleton
-
http://transpolyasexual.wordpress.com/ Cerberus137
-
http://twitter.com/agiamba Aaron Giambattista
-
http://twitter.com/agiamba Aaron Giambattista
-
barrilete26
-
MainlyMe
-
http://www.mcalcio.com Marco P.
-
http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UTLSJWJSGX4U6POVIKZ2SV2EJA da_undacoverbrother
-
http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UTLSJWJSGX4U6POVIKZ2SV2EJA da_undacoverbrother
-
VanWolfie
-
footballkid
-
Johnstoa
-
TheBrossy
-
TheBrossy
-
Johnstoa

World










