now, just a friendly reminder, look on the top of the article, it says:

I am not saying that this was fixed, perhaps poorly played, but definitely controversial – why? It wasn’t all that great!

No one said that there was a foul play, just

infatuated lies to elevate the status of something ordinary — 2 of the goals need to be credited to S&M as self goals.

And for those who can’t figure that one out just yet, too bad that you’re too blind to see that (yes I saw the replays 1000 times fram by frame).

Keep dreaming.

Crespo scores, is noside but is ruled offside and worse still, is yellow carded. THta makes it 5/6 clean goals.

Crespo is brought down in the box, a clear opportunity for a penalty, but since Arg., the team that I support (and I am Kenyan) is I believe 4-0, finds no reason to drive a dagger in their chest thus denying Arg. the penalty. Could it have gone in had it been awarded? The probability is 0.5

If the answer is no, Arg. could have ended with 5 goals.

If yes, they’d have been 6 goals.

But that is not what I wanted to tell you.

What I meant to say is;

1. The truth is the truth whether one chooses to believe it or not. Yours is more of consipracy theory.

2. The Chinese (I believe it is) have a saying that goes something like this; THE SKY IS NO LESSER BLUE JUST BECAUSE THE BLIND MAN CAN’T SEE! Piotr, I didn’t call you blind.

3. The dogs bark but the Caravan (Argentina) moves on.

Piotr, I didn’t call you a dog and would never do so.

Piotr, GIVE IT UP!!!!!!!

You seem to have a bruised ego.

Yours is a case of sour grapes.

This world has so many skeptics and cynics.

Just give it up my friend.

no 1 in real time as someone said, it is much more difficult for a goalie to decide where to go. saviola was coming towards him and could have shot- he passed it to maxi

no 2 again in real time, the goalie makes mistakes. your mistake equals someone elses gain yes? if there were no mistakes, and all the plays were perfect, then no one would ever score. he probably thought crespo was going to shoot. he didnt react fast enough to guess that it would be cambiasso. that’s art- the whole point of futbol is to outwit your opponent and beat them to the punch. you dont just do that with physical force- it requires intelligence which you clearly lack.

no 3 saviola went for the ball, no foul there. im sure youve seen people have the ball taken from them, they fall and it’s not considered a foul- no different here. saviola had no intent of injuring or stopping the player- he wanted the ball

no 4 it is difficult to tell whether that was crespo or stankovic- but at that speed it didnt matter- the ball was going to be hit by one of the 2 and both went for it. and at the speed they were both going, it was definitely going in.

no 5 was fucking amazing and if you dont think so, you’re an idiot who does not deserve to watch futbol at all

no. 6 was too quick for the goalie i suppose.

ps did i mention you’re an idiot?

u pple will never be impressed as long as its argentina.